In this article, I argue that traditional defenses of democracy’s epistemic value often rely on unpersuasive examples. Those examples are unpersuasive, in part, because they do not mirror actual political problems.

In this article, I articulate a useful definition of testimony for deliberative democracy. Borrowing from democratic theory and social epistemology, I argue that testimony adding epistemic value to democracy has been underappreciated.

In this article, with co-author Matthew LaVine, we argue that the recent histories of analytic philosophy have mischaracterized that work as deliberately irrelevant toward living a good life or being a good citizen.

In this shorter piece, I reflect on my experiences at the Summer Institute of Civic Studies and how, in that moment, I was thinking about Civic Studies and deliberation together as a research project.